0121 429 2838
lgs-enquiry@lordswoodtrust.co.uk
PUPIL PREMIUM - REVIEW OF 2016-17
Review of Impact 2016-17
Barrier 2016-17:
1) Attainment and Progress
Support and resources:
- Subject intervention support for KS4
- Revision guides and materials KS4
- Online tutor system (all year groups)
- License for accelerated reading programme (KS3)
- Raising achievement co-ordinator’s TLR
- Admin support with analysing PP data
- Contribution towards salary for a new mathematics teacher
Funding Allocation:
£65,950.50
Success Criteria:
A) PP comparison to Non PP Yr11 examination results (Progress 8).
B) Reading age shows significant improvement (12months+).
C) Yr11 PP students exceed PP national average progress 8 score.
Review of Impact:
A)
Progress 8
2017
2016
0.95 (41)
0.13 (32)
PP
0.81 (80)
0.69 (93)
Non PP
+0.13
-0.52
PP Gap
B)
Average reading age Sept 2016
Average reading age July 2017
Difference
Year Group
10 years 7 months
11 years 7 months
7
+12 months
11 years 7 months
12 years 3 months
8
+8 months
12 years 1 month
13 years 0 months
9
+11 months
C)
+0.58% against national average progress 8 score.
Barrier 2016-17:
2) Attendance
Support and resources:
- Funding of 50% of attendance officer’s salary
- Contribution to the ESW’s salary
- Contribution towards director of behaviour’s salary
- Contribution towards behaviour mentor salary
Funding Allocation:
£39,882
Success Criteria:
A) No gap between PP and non PP for attendance in each year group.
Review of Impact:
A)
Av. % of PP students
Av. % of Non PP
% Gap
Year Group
95.26
96.77
7
-1.51
92.28
96.05
8
-3.77
94.33
95.52
9
-1.19
93.62
95.83
10
-2.21
94.64
96.87
11
-2.23
Barrier 2016-17:
3) Behaviour
Support and resources:
- Applied learning activities
- Financial contribution to the LGS emotional support package
- Peer mentoring
- Purchasing rewards
- Contribution towards behaviour mentor salary
- Contributions towards PP students attending enrichment trips
Funding Allocation:
£38,200
Success Criteria:
A) Increase in % of PP students receiving praise slips compared to 2015-16 figures.
B) Decrease in % of students receiving alert slips compared to 2015-16 figures.
C) Number of PP students placed in isolation shows a reduction compared to 2015-16 figures.
Review of Impact:
A & B)
2015-16
2016-17
Difference
Measure
64%
92%
No of PP receiving 5+ praise points
+28%
8%
28%
No of PP students receiving 5+ alert slips
+20%
C)
2015-16
2016-17
No of PP students in isolation
Difference
24
15
1 day
-9
2
5
2 days
+3
0
3
3 days
+3
0
1
4 days
+1
Barrier 2016-17:
4) Raising Aspirations
Support and resources:
- To fund one third of the Brilliant Club scheme
- To fund cover costs for teacher supervision of Forward thinking trips
- Cover for two teachers to supervise the PP residential trip
- Financial support towards funding master classes
- Financial contribution towards the school minibus for escorting PP students on trips
- Peer mentoring for PP students who are also PP (Birmingham University)
Funding Allocation:
£45,908.50
Success Criteria:
A) PP comparison to Non PP Yr11 examination results (Progress 8).
B) All PP who are also HP students to meet or exceed expected progress.
C) Successful completion of the Brilliant Club programme.
D) All PP students to be given the opportunity to perform in school concerts.
E) All PP students to be given the opportunity to be involved in enrichment activities.
Review of Impact:
A)
Progress 8
2017
2016
0.95 (41)
0.13 (32)
PP
0.81 (80)
0.69 (93)
Non PP
+0.13
-0.52
PP Gap
B)
Measure
Number of subject areas
Student A
Below
1
Met
5
Exceeded
5
Measure
Number of subject areas
Student B
Below
3
Met
4
Exceeded
4
C) The Brilliant club programme did not run due to increased costs. Instead, allocated funding was used for 23 PP students across Yr7-11 to take part in local university activities.
D) 22% of pupil premium students took part in at least one school performance.
E) 79% of PP students (Yr7-11) involved in at least one extracurricular activity throughout the academic year.
5) Contingency Funding
Support and resources:
- Travel assistance
- Purchasing uniform
- Involvement in national schemes that roll out during the academic year
- Emergency family support
- Emotional and financial support for a vulnerable PP student
- Costs for admin and CPD resources related to PP support for staff and governors
- Costs to cover head of Mathematics and Ks3 co-ordinator to relieve them to support students 1:1
Funding Allocation:
£5,789
Review of Impact:
- A contribution to cover booking outside agencies in for PSHEE sessions to enable PP students to be effectively informed about issues surrounding mental health and sex education.
- Funding the running of a breakfast club to help support PP students.
- Funding cover costs for the post holder responsible for raising achievement of pupil premium students to attend two conferences on catering for disadvantaged youths.
- Purchasing calculators for all PP students in Year 11.
- Purchasing a bus pass for one student (£30.60).
- Purchasing uniform for two students (£77.75).
Total allocation: £195,730 Overspend of: £1250